Wednesday, January 09, 2008
First Freedom Campaign
NSA report confirms Gulf of Tonkin incident never happened
The author of the report "demonstrates that not only is it not true, as (then US) secretary of defense Robert McNamara told Congress, that the evidence of an attack was 'unimpeachable,' but that to the contrary, a review of the classified signals intelligence proves that 'no attack happened that night,'" FAS said in a statement."
What this study demonstrated is that the available intelligence shows that there was no attack. It's a dramatic reversal of the historical record," Aftergood said.
US health care system ranks last, France #1, again
France, Japan and Australia rated best and the United States worst in new rankings focusing on preventable deaths due to treatable conditions in 19 leading industrialized nations, researchers said on Tuesday.
If the U.S. health care system performed as well as those of those top three countries, there would be 101,000 fewer deaths in the United States per year, according to researchers writing in the journal Health Affairs.
Sunday, January 06, 2008
GOP Congressman not sure if he will accept hedge fund lobby job
Chris in Paris, AmericaBlog.com: Right. I'm sure he is struggling with whether or not to stick around for another term in the minority or accept the $1,000,000 per year position. Congressman Baker (R-LA) has followed the new procedures and filed paperwork with the House ethics committee as he talks to the increasingly power hedge fund lobby. The revolving door between Congress and wealthy lobbyists continues. Tell me again what the ethics and lobbying reform bill was supposed to do last year? The best democracy that money can buy.LSB: He's not sure whether he'd take a job at six times his House salary? Sounds like the perfect choice for a finance lobbyist!
Mike Huckabee: The GOP’s Rebellious Love Child?
GOP elitists are troubled by Mike Huckabee’s success. These obtuse overlords, who have gleefully championed their religiosity and conventional marriage, have two problems. One, their own marriage of convenience is about to disintegrate…and two, they were foolish enough to produce an offspring that is now older and wiser and fully capable of unrestrained rebellion.Saturday, January 05, 2008
CBS NEWS "60 MINUTES": OUT IN IRAQ
Manzella shortly after the 60 Minutes broadcast: "I have not received any notification, positive or negative, from my command since I notified them of my participation in the story or since the broadcasting of the segment...I have served with many men and women in Iraq, Kuwait and throughout the United States. In my opinion, they do not care if a service member is gay or straight. These men and women are my brothers and sisters in arms and I am the same to them. I know that what matters to most is not the sexual orientation of the person in your unit. What matters most is if that person is a good worker, a team player and most importantly, if that person has your back when it rewally matters whether it be in a combat zone, during a training exercise or day to day operations. I think that a majority of troops are in favor, or at the very least indifferent, to the repeal of this policy. I find that many are surprised that so much power and influence over the fate of this policy lies in the hands of individuals who are not even in the ranks of the military."
Presidential candidates on gay civil rights
The issue of civil rights for gay men and lesbians — including the definition of marriage, service in the military and protection against hate crimes — has long divided the two major political parties. It's not as simple as saying Democrats are for them, and Republicans are against them. Democrats are divided on same-sex marriage, and some GOP contenders for the White House want to recognize civil unions for gays. Candidate positions were compiled by Gannett News Service and USA TODAY.Democrats:
Republicans:
Pollster Bias
FaithInPublicLife.org: News coverage of the Iowa caucuses read like it was written in advance. Might you have foreseen that evangelicals would be credited for a Huckabee win and that an Obama victory would be spun as a Clarion Call For Change?There's a large hole in this conventional wisdom, though: Faith was effectively barred from consideration as a factor in Obama's victory. The CNN entrance and NBC exit polls both asked Republican caucus-goers if they were "born-again or evangelical," and neither one asked that question of Democratic caucusers. Democrats instead were instead asked if they were union members.
Thirty three percent of Iowa evangelicals voted for Kerry in 2004. The Religion Newswriters' Association named "Democrats court people of faith" the #2 religion story of 2007. Winner Barack Obama is well known for thoughtful discussion of his faith.
So why are CNN and NBC still treating evangelicals as the Republicans' property? Their polls don't even account for the possibility that evangelicals can play a significant role in the Democratic caucus. That's some serious institutional bias. (Ditto for the flipside - not accounting for union members' role in the Republican caucus.) Reporters and pundits cannot produce accurate stories and commentary if all they have to work with is such hidebound data.
Once Again, Looking Out for Himself - Not You, MS!
ThinkProgress.org: Lott seals the deal on new lobbying position. ThinkProgress reported in November that outgoing Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS) may have been negotiating a future lobbying position with former Sen. John Breaux in potential violation of Senate ethics rules that take effect this year. At the time, Lott claimed, “I’m not really involved in negotiation. I’ve tried to stay away from that.” But now, just two weeks after resigning from the Senate, Lott announced that he is indeed joining with Breaux to form a lobbying group:Putting weeks of speculation to rest, former Sens. Trent Lott (R-Miss.) and John Breaux (D-La.) confirmed Friday they plan to file paperwork next week to form a
powerful lobbying partnership called The Breaux Lott Leadership Group.
FOX Business Network tanks in the ratings
Even though it’s just getting off the ground these rating make Tucker Carlson look good. C&L draws that many readers in about 40 minutes. Rupert doesn’t care if he loses millions of dollars for years to come because he has the cash to fund a media loser for ions. To him—it’s just another venue to extend his GOP/NEOCON/free market/NAFTA loving beliefs. Media Bistro has more.Only 6,000 people are watching Rupert Murdoch’s new all business cable network during the work day, according to Nielsen ratings data obtained by the Daily News. And, after eight weeks on the air, Fox Business Channel is averaging just 15,000 viewers in prime time.
If the average number of viewers at night all got together, they wouldn’t even fill Madison Square Garden. For comparison, 284,000 viewers tune in to CNBC during the day, with 238,000 in prime time.
California files lawsuit against Bush EPA
Chris in Paris, AmericanBlog.com: The better news is that up to 15 other states will be joining. Only a kooky Republican administration could manage to turn the EPA into an extension of the pro-pollution lobby. You can't even make this stuff up any more. Well, not unless another kooky Republican administration wins next year.
Federal Reserve injects even more cash into banks
Chris in Paris, AmericaBlog.com: While Bush says everything is fine with the economy, the Fed has increased its future cash injections by 50% so that banks can maintain proper liquidity. Ignore the high fuel prices, forget about the housing crash, don't even think about the employment numbers and for heavens sake, pretend as though we do not have a credit crisis in America. All done? Great. Now you too can be just like George Bush. Not a problem in the world. Heck, with this great strategy of ignoring the facts on the ground, it's no wonder he's once again talking about tax cuts.Taking action to help the economy (which Bush says is solid) makes perfect sense. If ever there was a moment to take the keys away from Bush it's now. For him to stand up and say the "economy is on a solid foundation" should be all we need to hear from him. The Democrats - especially the presidential candidates - are going to have to step up and provide their own plan. Leaving these decisions up to the idiot who created them would be painfully foolish. Do the Democrats have it in them to take on this challenge?

